Of course moving pictures are mostly fantasy. Real life is more mundane – even in the executive suite. And it is never as clear-cut as the narrative of a 90-minute screen story. Few of the pictures mentioned are morality tales, and several of the best, such as Citizen Kane or There Will Be Blood, leave questions unanswered. Arguably, the villains are often the most dynamic characters – like Williamson (Kevin Spacey) in Glengarry Glen Ross .
当然,电影几乎都是幻想。真实生活更加平凡——即使你住在行政套房也不过如此。而且真实生活也不会像90分钟的电影叙事那样清楚明了。上文提到的影片中几乎没有伦理剧,而且还有几部像《公民凯恩》、《血色将至》这样的经典影片采用了开放式结局。有人会说,反面人物往往都是最具活力的角色,例如凯文·史派西(Kevin Spacey)在《拜金一族》中扮演的约翰·威廉姆森(John Williamson)。
Does this rather negative image of capitalism in show business actually matter? Yes, because the media influences hearts and minds, and can make an impact on consumer support and government policy. Or perhaps I should just revise my taste in films?
电影工业塑造的这种较为负面的资本主义形象是否会对现实生活造成影响?答案是肯定的。因为媒体能够影响民众的情绪和思维,并能在赢得消费者支持以及影响政府政策方面发挥作用。不过也有可能是我自己该调整观影品味了。
【十大“反资”电影?】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15