Standard & Poor’s misled investors by awarding its highest rating to a complex derivative product that collapsed in value less than two years after it was created by ABN Amro’s wholesale banking division, an Australian judge has ruled in a landmark case that paves the way for legal action in Europe.
澳大利亚一名法官在一个里程碑式的案件中裁决,标普(Standard & Poor)对荷兰银行(ABN Amro)批发银行部门创造的一种复杂衍生品的最高评级误导了投资者,该衍生产品在不到两年期间价值崩溃。此次判决为在欧洲采取法律行动铺平了道路。
In a damning verdict, the Federal Court of Australia ruled that S&P and ABN Amro had “deceived and “misled 12 local councils that bought triple-A rated constant proportion debt obligations (CPDOs) from an intermediary in 2006.
澳大利亚联邦法院在措辞严厉的判决书中表示,标普与荷兰银行对2006年从一家中介机构购买AAA评级固定比例债务债券(CPDO)的12个地方议会构成“欺骗和“误导。
The court said a “reasonably competent rating agency could not have given a triple A rating to the “grotesquely complicated securities. S&P and ABN’s wholesale banking arm, which is now owned by RBS, also published information and statements that were either “false or involved “negligent misrepresentations, Justice Jayne Jagot found.
【澳洲法院判决标普误导投资者】相关文章:
★ 世界各地喜迎新年
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15