但是对于那些质疑大修体育场的人士来说,问题并不在于钱,而是在于钱的去处。
There are benefits on an individual scale as well. In apost-World Cup report, the South African government claimed that stadium construction created 66,000 jobs that generated over $900 million in wages.
邦德说:“天知道真正的开销是多少。土地的价值又是多少?还有机会成本呢?如果我们把钱投在住房上,那么动乱可能就会少很多。”
But for those who question the stadium booms, the issue is not the spending, but what it buys.
邦德表示,如果他的祖国少选几座城市,少建几所新场馆,那么就可以打造“一个有更多非洲民众参加的世界杯,而不是一个最赚钱、靠富人和奢华场馆装点的世界杯。”
“Who knows what the figures really were,” says Bond. “What was the value of the land? And what are the opportunity costs? Let’s say we spent that money on housing. We would probably have many fewer riots.”
斯茨曼斯基说,世界杯被看作是一个针对游客的奢华赛事,这种观念才是结症所在。
Bond says that, had his country been content with having fewer new stadiums in fewer cities, it could have created “a more African-scaled World Cup rather than the most profitable World Cup with the richest taking and the most glorious stadiums.”
【全球聚焦南美洲 巴西世界杯能赚钱吗】相关文章:
★ 权游最终季:痛快追剧怎么少得了权游周边!有吃有喝还有面儿
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15