—David E. Sanger
Mr. Trump said the Islamic State would never have come into power if the United States had stayed in Iraq, and if the United States had “taken the oil,” especially in Libya.
特朗普说如果美国留在伊拉克,如果美国“拿走石油”,尤其在利比亚,伊斯兰国永远不会掌权。
The assertion is impossible to disprove, but it’s unlikely that 10,000 troops remaining in Iraq would have made much of a difference — especially in Syria and Libya, where the United States never had troops. Moreover, much of the Islamic State’s revenue has come from smuggling and taxes on local people, and much of the oil infrastructure has been destroyed, as has the Islamic State’s transportation network.
这一说法很难证否,但10000名军队留在伊拉克不可能有什么用,尤其对叙利亚和利比亚而言,美国在那里从未驻军。另外,伊斯兰国大多数收入来自走私和对当地居民收税,大多数石油基础设施被毁,伊斯兰国的交通也被阻断。
—David E. Sanger
Mr. Trump said that the United States should have taken Iraq’s oil. It is an assertion that he made a few weeks ago, and one that was roundly criticized at the time. Seizing Iraq’s oil — or the resources of any country — is illegal under international law, and doing so would have likely prompted condemnation from around the world.
【特朗普和希拉里第一次辩论说错了什么?】相关文章:
最新
2019-01-07
2019-01-07
2019-01-07
2019-01-07
2019-01-07
2019-01-05