英国央行的高官能够展现出这样的自由思想,值得说道说道。不管人们对于“占领运动的策略或目标看法如何,这场运动对危机前金融体系提出的批评,至少在一定程度上是切中要害的。金融业提供的奖励过多,助长了该行业的过度扩张。这不仅催生出一套不稳定的体系、最终要由纳税人出手救援,还对经济造成了长期破坏,因为它分流走了研究密集型行业的人才和资金。弥补这个疏漏要花费多年时间。
Mr Haldane could perhaps have larded his praise with some criticism. Occupy was wrong to assert that inequality is an inevitable consequence of free-market capitalism, for instance. The too-big-to-fail institutions that populated pre-crisis banking were the opposite of what free markets should beget. But perhaps, as the movement’s guest, Mr Haldane felt it would be impolite to point this out.
霍尔丹的称赞之中或许夹杂着一些批评。比方说,“占领运动错误地断言,不平等是自由市场资本主义的必然结果。危机前银行业充斥的“大到不能倒机构,与自由市场应该产生的结果背道而驰。不过,作为“占领运动的“客人,霍尔丹或许觉得指出这一点有些失礼。
He did, however, enumerate ways in which policy makers are seeking to make the system work better, whether by tightening capital requirements, or ring fencing investment banking arms off from retail subsidiaries. Boldly, he even suggested that the repair of the system was an endeavour in which central bankers and Occupy were jointly engaged.
【FT社评:金融业竞争太少】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15