P2P第二个妙招是将兼职者引入该市场以满足需求激增时的情况。只是为了应对暑假旺季就建设新酒店,或是为了解决新年夜的打车高峰而增加出租车——那是效率低下的;但是,只要有需求,P2P市场就可以引入一些额外的供应。结果就是,周五晚上11点在P2P平台更容易叫到车,学校假期时P2P提供的客房价格更合理。
Peer-to-peer markets are well worth having. The challenge for regulators, then, is to catch up.How should Airbnb landlords who let a room for 10 nights a year be placed on a level playingfield with regular bed-and-breakfast landlords? Are Uber drivers employees (as a Californialabour commissioner recently ruled)? Or freelancers using Uber’s software to help them do theirjobs (as Uber insists)? Or something else?
P2P市场非常值得拥有。因此,监管者面临的挑战是赶上其发展的脚步。应该如何把Airbnb上每年只把房间出租10晚的房东与长期经营住宿加早餐旅店(B&B)的房东放在同一个监管层面上?Uber专车司机是公司雇员(就像加州劳工委员会最近裁决的那样),还是利用Uber软件工作的自由职业者(像Uber主张的那样)?或是其他性质?
James Surowiecki, writing in The New Yorker, recently argued for “something else, and calledfor a regulatory overhaul to give “gig-economy workers a better balance of flexibility andsecurity. That sounds like an admirable aim, although achieving it isn’t straightforward.Giving pensions, vacation rights or unemployment insurance to Uber drivers or TaskRabbit“taskers would require both clever rules and clever admin systems.
【释放P2P的经济价值】相关文章:
★ 奥运让北京更文明
★ 狐狸和乌鸦
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15