“Uber has been operating in Atlanta with little concern about the safety of their passengers andzero concern for the laws that protect them, said one of the plaintiffs in a statement to TheAtlanta Journal-Constitution. “Our incomes have steadily dropped since Uber started and legallylicensed drivers are leaving the business.
“Uber在亚特兰大的运营几乎毫不考虑乘客的安全问题,也从未顾及保护乘客的法律,一名原告在《亚特兰大宪法日报》(Atlanta Journal-Constitution)上发表声明称,“自Uber开始运营以来,我们的收入节节下滑,拥有合法执照的出租车司机正在离开这个行业。
In other words, peer-to-peer services such as Uber are said to be hazardous, and they arealso unwelcome competition for incumbents. (Several studies have supported the common-sense conclusion that these new competitors threaten the revenue of existing players.)
换句话说,Uber等P2P服务被称为危险服务,而且给现有从业者带来了不受欢迎的竞争。(一些研究支持这个常识性结论:新竞争者威胁到了现有从业者的收入。)
These might seem very different issues. It’s one thing to worry about signposting fire exitswhen you let out a spare room on Airbnb. Protecting the profit margins of fine upstanding localhoteliers is another matter.
这两点或许貌似截然不同的问题。你在Airbnb上出租一个单间时担心消防通道指示是一回事,而保护当地正规酒店经营者的利润空间是另外一回事。
【释放P2P的经济价值】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15