波士顿大学(Boston University)管理学院的马克·威廉斯(Mark Williams)表示:“这是孤注一掷之举,我认为有些事情可能被忽视了。哈佛商学院(Harvard Business School)教授戴维·约菲(David Yoffie)表示,包括该公司内部会计师和投行家在内的顾问们也犯了过错。不过他补充道,部分责任应由惠普管理层和董事会承担,“因为它们没有提出足够多的问题,也没有发现麻烦的迹象。
Ms Whitman can at least point to a thorough board overhaul, undertaken just before the Autonomy deal, that was designed to put paid to HP’s reputation of bad governance once and for all. And she claims a more direct personal management style that has led to the latest directors being better informed than their predecessors.
惠特曼至少还能提出要对董事会实施全面改革,并在收购Autonomy前夕开始实施。改革旨在一劳永逸地洗清惠普在公司治理方面表现欠佳的坏名声。她自称拥有更加直接的个人管理风格,因此,与前任管理风格相比,新晋董事们能够更方便全面地获取信息。
“I tell my board everything, she says. “That’s quite a different board management style than, I think, my predecessors.
她说:“我把一切都告诉董事会。我认为,这是与我前任完全不同的董事会管理风格。
“HP probably had more governance problems than any large company in America but Meg cleaned house in 2011, says Mr Yoffie. “It is hard to ascribe deeper systemic governance problems when the board and the CEO are new.
【分析:惠普能走出泥沼吗?】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15