此次诉讼指控哈佛大学在制度上歧视亚裔美国人,违反了民权法。诉讼称哈佛事实上实施了“种族平衡”的软配额。原告指出,这个制度人为地压缩亚裔学生人数,使资质更逊色的白人、黑人和西语裔申请人得到录取机会。
Harvard and the group suing it have presented sharply divergent views of what constitutes a fair admissions process.
对于什么是公平的录取过程,哈佛大学和提起诉讼的组织表达了截然不同的观点。
“It turns out that the suspicions of Asian-American alumni, students and applicants were right all along,” the group, Students for Fair Admissions, said in a court document laying out the analysis. “Harvard today engages in the same kind of discrimination and stereotyping that it used to justify quotas on Jewish applicants in the 1920s and 1930s.”
“学生公平录取”组织在列出上述分析报告的一份法庭文件中说:“亚裔校友、在校生和申请人的怀疑原来一直都是对的,哈佛大学今日持有的歧视与成见,与它在20世纪二三十年代给犹太申请人设定限额并为之自辩时如出一辙。”
哈佛大学如何回应?
Harvard vigorously disagreed on Friday, saying that its own expert analysis showed no discrimination and that seeking diversity is a valuable part of student selection. The university lashed out at the founder of Students for Fair Admissions, Edward Blum, accusing him of using Harvard to replay a previous challenge to affirmative action in college admissions, Fisher v. the University of Texas at Austin. In its 2016 decision in that case, the Supreme Court ruled that race could be used as one of many factors in admissions.
【哈佛歧视亚裔案曝新证据!“人都没见,直接给亚裔最低分”】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15