但禁止中国公司进入美国市场解决不了这个问题。阿尔卡特-朗讯在中国与上海贝尔(Shanghai Bell)建有合资企业,爱立信及其他厂商使用的许多设备都是在中国生产的。如果中共与解放军想搞点小动作,他们完全可以从这些设备上下手。
Nor is there direct evidence of malfeasance against Huawei and ZTE in the report, although one section is classified. Meanwhile, the committee alleges that the companies breach patents and enjoy support from China in the form of soft loans.
而且,众议院情报委员会的报告也没有给出华为和中兴从事不法活动的直接证据,尽管报告的某一部分是保密的。与此同时,该委员会还指责这两家企业违反专利法以及享受中国以软贷款形式提供的扶持。
Both could be true but they are the stuff of trade and intellectual property disputes rather than an intelligence concern. The committee undermines its case by sounding as if it seeks any excuse to exclude Chinese competitors.
这两个指责也许都符合事实,但它们属于贸易与知识产权争议范畴,而不是什么情报安全方面的担忧。该委员会的行为听起来像是在寻找一切借口将中国竞争者拒之门外,它提出的论点因此受到了削弱。
The companies have not helped themselves. Huawei is a reclusive outfit that did not publish the names of its directors until a few years ago. Sun Yafang, its chairwoman, is reported to have once worked at the Ministry of State Security and, like other companies, it has an internal Communist party committee whose exact purpose is mysterious.
【美国应向华为敞开大门】相关文章:
★ 美国金币销量激增
★ 美国大选与金价
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15